Marking Criteria
The assessment will be marked out of 100 and will be weighted 20% of the total unit mark.
Marking Criteria
Not Satisfactory (0-49% of the criterion mark)
Satisfactory (50-64, of the criterion mark)
Good (65-74% of the criterion mark)
Very Good (75-84, of the criterion mark)
Excellent (85400% of the criterion mark)
Relevance of the critique (30 marks)
the topic p-ompts, and do not extend knowledge. amplify or explore the topic in any meaningful way
address the topic prompts, and could do much more to extend knowledge, amplify and explore the topic in more detail
topic prompts, but could do more to extend knowledge, amplify and explore the topic in more
Critiques address the topic prompts, extend knowledge or amplify of explore the topic in more detail
int■ques address the topic prompts directly, extend knowledge, amplify and explore the topic in significant detail.
Quality of the expression and delivery of the critiques (20 Mar.)
No opinions or ideas expressed. Poor Pruanncutrt.i:r7n”rngaialcd
posts.
Opinions and ideas are unclear and lacking in support. Several grammar, spelling or punctuation errors.
Opinions and ideas are clearly stated with an occasional lack of supporting evidence. Few grammar, spelling or punctuation errors.
Opinions are expressed in a clear, concise and well-supported manner. No grammar, spelling or punctuation errors.
Contributions add significant value to the discussions, are thoughtful, well-written and contribute relevant additional resources and perspectives
Evidence-based critique (20 Marks)
Critiques are not supported by evidence, and claims are made without any supporting evidence
Critiques are occasionally supported by evidence, and many claims are made without the support of evidence
Critiques are sometimes supported by evidence, however sometimes the evidence for claims being made is lack,
Cf;ecvliudesnacrees:luT:17″‘ appropriate.
Critiques are strongly supported by evidence where appropriate.
Presentation is structured and case “11.’1 regp7odpo’sred research. (30 marks)
The critique is not
aacncdet°,`,:bcI:sseT:tur’
undertaking the proposed research is not acceptably addressed Limited display of media shown.
The critique is acceptably rructurecad’ea” orLndera undertaking proposed research is acceptably addressed. Limited display of media shown.
The critique is mostly Iotrructu’u’enddert and undertaking T the case e proposed research is mostly addressed. Adequate display of media shown.
The critique is well d t rorructuLrFileddetnaki„hge cath:
proposed research is well addressed. Strong display of media shown.
The critique is well
satcrldjeus=tanedceaxseceffioer””Y undertaking theproposed research. Excellent display of media shown.
AssignmentTutorOnline
————-
Criteria for Evaluation
The assessment will be graded out of 100 points and will account for 20% of the total unit grade.
Criteria for Evaluation
Not good enough (0-49 percent of the criterion mark)
a satisfactory result (50-64, of the criterion mark)
Very good (65-74 percent of the criterion mark)
Excellent (75-84, of the criterion mark)
Exceptional (85400 percent of the criterion mark)
The critique’s relevance (30 marks)
The topic p-ompts rather than expanding knowledge. enlarge or investigate the issue in any way that is meaningful
address the prompts, and could do a lot more to expand knowledge, magnify, and go further into the topic.
topic prompts, but there is more that might be done to expand knowledge, magnify, and investigate the issue in greater depth.
Critiques address the topic prompts, extend knowledge or amplify of explore the
