Week 8: Summative Assignment: Critique of Research Article
The body of your paper should be 4–6 double-spaced pages plus a cover page and a reference page. The critique must be attached to the article and follow Ace homework tutors – APA guidelines. PLEASE USE ARTICLES UPLOADED
A research critique demonstrates your ability to critically read an investigative study. For this assignment, choose a research article related to nursing.
· Articles used for this assignment cannot be used for the other assignments (students should find new research articles for each new assignment).
· The selected articles should be original research articles. Review articles, concept analysis, meta-analysis, meta-synthesis, integrative review, and systemic review should not be used.
· Mixed-methods studies should not be used.
· Dissertations should not be used.
Your critique should include the following:
Research Problem/Purpose
· State the problem clearly as it is presented in the report.
· Have the investigators placed the study problem within the context of existing knowledge?
· Will the study solve a problem relevant to nursing?
· State the purpose of the research.
Review of the Literature
· Identify the concepts explored in the literature review.
· Were the references current? If not, what do you think the reasons are?
· Was there evidence of reflexivity in the design (qualitative)?
Theoretical Framework
· Are the theoretical concepts defined and related to the research?
· Does the research draw solely on nursing theory or does it draw on theory from other disciplines?
· Is a theoretical framework stated in this research piece?
· If not, suggest one that might be suitable for the study.
Variables/Hypotheses/Questions/Assumptions (Quantitative)
· What are the independent and dependent variables in this study?
· Are the operational definitions of the variables given? If so, are they concrete and measurable?
· Is the research question or the hypothesis stated? What is it?
Conceptual Underpinnings, Research Questions (Qualitative)
· Are key concepts defined conceptually?
· Is the philoosoophical basis, underlying tradition, conoceptual framework, or ideological orientation made explicit and is it appropriate for the problem?
· Are research questions explicitly stated? Are the questions consistent with the study’s philosophical basis, underlying tradition, conceptual framework, or ideological orientation?
Methodology
· What type of design (quantitative, qualitative, and type) was used in this study?
· Was inductive or deductive reasoning used in this study?
· State the sample size and study population, sampling method, and study setting.
· Did the investigator choose a probability or non-probability sample?
· State the type of reliability and the validity of the measurement tools (quantitative only)
Qualitative studies (answer the following questions in addition to those above except the last bulleted item)
· Were the methods of gathering data appropriate?
· Were data gathered through two or more methods to achieve triangulation?
· Did the researcher ask the right questions or make the right observations and were they recorded in an appropriate fashion?
· Was a sufficient amount of data gathered?
· Was the data of sufficient depth and richness?
Were ethical considerations addressed? Were appropriate procedures used to safeguard the rights of study participants?
Data Analysis
· What data analysis tool was used?
· Was saturation achieved? (qualitative)
· How were the results presented in the study?
· Were the data management (e.g., coding) and data analysis methods sufficiently described? (qualitative)
· Identify at least one (1) finding.
Homework help – Summary/Conclusions, Implications, and Recommendations
· Do the themes adequately capture the meaning of the data?
· Did the analysis yield an insightful, provocative and meaningful picture of the phenomenon under investigation?
· Were methods used to enhance the trustworthiness of the data (and analysis) and was the description of those methods adequate?
· Are there clear explanation of the boundaries/limitations, thick description, audit trail?
· What are the strengths and limitations of the study?
· In terms of the findings, can the researcher generalize to other populations? Explain.
· Evaluate the findings and conclusions as to their significance for nursing (both qualitative and quantitative).
The body of your paper should be 4–6 double-spaced pages plus a cover page and a reference page. The critique must be attached to the article and follow Ace homework tutors – APA guidelines.
Need Ace homework tutors – APA Help?
You must submit the research study articles along with your assignment.
Review the rubric for further information on how your assignment will be graded.
Rubric
NURS_350_OL – NURS350-Research Critique
NURS_350_OL – NURS350-Research Critique
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch Problem/Purpose
28 to >24.92 pts
Meets or Exceeds Expectations
Research problem, purpose of research, and relevance to nursing are clearly identified.
24.92 to >21.0 pts
Mostly Meets Expectations
Research problem, purpose of research, and relevance to nursing are somewhat identified.
21 to >16.52 pts
Below Expectations
Research problem, purpose of research, and relevance to nursing are mostly absent or misidentified.
16.52 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Research problem, purpose of research, and relevance to nursing are absent.
28 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReview of the Literature
42 to >37.38 pts
Meets or Exceeds Expectations
Concepts explored in the literature review are clearly identified. Critique of the references is included and well developed.
37.38 to >31.5 pts
Mostly Meets Expectations
Concepts explored in the literature review are somewhat identified. Critique of the references is included, but may not be fully developed.
31.5 to >24.78 pts
Below Expectations
Concepts explored in the literature review are misidentified. Critique of the references is severely lacking.
24.78 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Concepts explored in the literature review are absent. Critique of the references is absent.
42 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTheoretical Framework
28 to >24.92 pts
Meets or Exceeds Expectations
A theoretical concept/framework is identified and well analyzed for appropriateness. If the article lacks a concept/framework, a suitable one is suggested.
24.92 to >21.0 pts
Mostly Meets Expectations
A theoretical concept/framework is somewhat identified and analyzed for appropriateness. If the article lacks a concept/framework, a potential concept/framework is suggested, but it is somewhat inappropriate.
21 to >16.52 pts
Below Expectations
A theoretical concept/framework is somewhat identified and analyzed for appropriateness. If the article lacks a concept/framework, a potential concept/framework is suggested, is not identified or is grossly inappropriate.
16.52 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
A theoretical concept/framework is misidentified or not analyzed for appropriateness.
28 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVariables, Hypotheses, Questions, and Assumptions
14 to >12.46 pts
Meets or Exceeds Expectations
IV and DV are identified and defined. Ace my homework – Write my paper – Online assignment help tutors – Discussion on measurability is included. Research question and hypothesis are identified.
12.46 to >10.5 pts
Mostly Meets Expectations
IV and DV are somewhat identified and or partially defined. Ace my homework – Write my paper – Online assignment help tutors – Discussion on measurability is somewhat included. Research question and hypothesis are partially identified.
10.5 to >8.26 pts
Below Expectations
IV and DV identification and definition are absent or severely lacking. Ace my homework – Write my paper – Online assignment help tutors – Discussion on measurability is absent or inaccurate. Research question and hypothesis are not identified or grossly misidentified.
8.26 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
IV and DV identification and definition are absent. Ace my homework – Write my paper – Online assignment help tutors – Discussion on measurability is absent. Research question and hypothesis are not identified.
14 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMethodology
56 to >49.84 pts
Meets or Exceeds Expectations
Type of design, sample size, study population, sampling method, and type of reasoning are properly identified. Reliability and validity of measurement tools, ethical considerations, and probability vs. non-probability sampling are discussed.
49.84 to >42.0 pts
Mostly Meets Expectations
Type of design, sample size, study population, sampling method, and type of reasoning are somewhat identified. Reliability and validity of measurement tools, ethical considerations, and probability vs. non-probability sampling are discussed, but some information is inaccurate.
42 to >33.04 pts
Below Expectations
Type of design, sample size, study population, sampling method, and type of reasoning are absent or misidentified. Reliability and validity of measurement tools, ethical considerations, and probability vs. non-probability sampling are either absent or grossly inaccurate.
33.04 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Type of design, sample size, study population, sampling method, and type of reasoning are absent. Reliability and validity of measurement tools, ethical considerations, and probability vs. non-probability sampling are absent.
56 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeData Analysis
42 to >37.38 pts
Meets or Exceeds Expectations
Data analysis tool is identified. An explanation on how the results are presented in the study is included and accurate. At least one finding is appropriately identified.
37.38 to >31.5 pts
Mostly Meets Expectations
Data analysis tool is somewhat identified. An incomplete explanation on how the results are presented in the study is included. At least one finding is identified.
31.5 to >24.78 pts
Below Expectations
Data analysis tool is absent or misidentified. An explanation on how the results are presented in the study is absent or grossly unclear. Findings are not included or are grossly inaccurate.
24.78 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Data analysis tool is absent. An explanation on how the results are presented in the study is absent. Findings are not included.
42 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeHomework help – Summary, Conclusions, Implications, and Recommendations
56 to >49.84 pts
Meets or Exceeds Expectations
Strengths and limitations of the study are identified. A discussion on whether or not the study can be generalized is included. An evaluation of the findings, conclusions, and significance to nursing is included and appropriate.
49.84 to >42.0 pts
Mostly Meets Expectations
Strengths and limitations of the study are somewhat identified. A discussion on whether or not the study can be generalized is included but may not be fully developed. An evaluation of the findings, conclusions, and significance to nursing may not be fully developed.
42 to >33.04 pts
Below Expectations
Strengths and limitations of study are absent or lacking. A discussion on whether or not the study can be generalized is absent or lacking. An evaluation of the findings, conclusions, and significance to nursing is absent or inappropriate.
33.04 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Strengths and limitations of study are absent. A discussion on whether or not the study can be generalized is absent. An evaluation of the findings, conclusions, and significance to nursing is absent.
56 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics and Ace homework tutors – APA Format
14 to >12.46 pts
Meets or Exceeds Expectations
Written in a clear, concise, formal, and organized manner. Responses are mostly error free. Information from sources is appropriately paraphrased and accurately cited.
12.46 to >10.5 pts
Mostly Meets Expectations
Writing is generally clear and organized but is not concise or formal in language. Multiple errors exist in spelling and grammar with minor interference with readability or comprehension. Most information from sources is correctly paraphrased and cited.
10.5 to >8.26 pts
Below Expectations
Writing is generally unclear and unorganized. Some errors in spelling and grammar detract from readability and comprehension. Sources are missing or improperly cited.
8.26 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Writing is unclear and unorganized. Errors in spelling and grammar detract from readability and comprehension. Sources are missing.
Week 8: Summative Assignment: Research Article Critique
4–6 double-spaced pages plus a cover page and a reference page should make up the body of your paper. The critique should be appended to the article and formatted according to Ace homework tutors – APA standards. PLEASE USE THE ARTICLES THAT HAVE BEEN UPLOADED.
A research criticism exhibits your ability to analyze a research project critically. Choose a nursing-related research article for your task.
This assignment’s articles cannot be used for any other assignments (students should find new research articles for each new assignment).
Original research articles should be among the articles chosen. Concept analysis, meta-analysis, meta-synthesis, integrative review, and systematic review are not appropriate.
Mixed-methods research should be avoided.
Dissertations are not to be used.
The following should be included in your critique:
Problem/Purpose of Research
Clearly state the problem as it appears in the report.
Have the researchers framed the research problem in the perspective of previous knowledge?
Will the study address a nursing-related issue?
Declare the research’s purpose.
Examine the Literature
Identify the themes that were discussed during the literature review.
Were the references up to date? What do you suppose the causes are if not?
Was there any evidence of reflexivity (qualitative) in the design?
Theoretical Foundation
Is it possible to define and apply theoretical concepts to the research?
Is the research primarily based on nursing theory, or does it also include theory from other disciplines?
Is there a theoretical framework in this study paper?
If not, propose one that would be appropriate for the research.
Variables/Hypotheses/Questions/Assumptions/Assumptions/Assumptions/Assumptions/Assumptions/A (Quantitative)
What are the study’s independent and dependent variables?
Is it possible to get the operational definitions of the variables? Are they concrete and measurable, if so?
Is there a statement of the study question or hypothesis? What exactly is it?
Research Questions, Conceptual Underpinnings (Qualitative)
Are crucial notions cognitively defined?
Is the philosophical foundation, underlying tradition, conceptual framework, or ideological orientation made plain, and is it relevant to the problem?
Are the research questions presented clearly? Is the study’s philosophical foundation, underlying tradition, conceptual framework, or ideological orientation consistent with the questions?
Methodology
In this study, what type of design (quantitative, qualitative, and type) was used?
Was this study based on inductive or deductive reasoning?
State the sample size and population of the study, as well as the sampling process and study location.
Is it a probability or non-probability sample that the investigator used?
Describe the measurement tools’ level of reliability and validity (quantitative only)
Qualitative research (except from the last bulleted item, answer the following questions in addition to the ones listed above)
Were the data collection procedures appropriate?
To accomplish triangulation, were data collected using two or more methods?
Is it possible that the researcher asked the right questions or made the right observations, and that they were documented properly?
Was there enough information gathered?
Was there enough depth and variety in the data?
Were ethical considerations taken into account? Were proper safeguards in place to protect the rights of research participants?
Analyze the data
What kind of data analysis software was used?
Was it possible to reach saturation? (qualitative)
How were the study’s findings presented?
Were the methodologies for data management (e.g., coding) and data analysis adequately described? (qualitative)
At least one (1) finding should be identified.
Conclusions, Implications, and Recommendations Homework help – Summary/Conclusions, Implications, and Recommendations
Do the themes effectively capture the data’s meaning?
Is the picture of the phenomenon under examination intelligent, intriguing, and meaningful as a result of the analysis?
Were procedures utilized to improve the data’s (and analysis’) reliability, and was the description of those approaches adequate?
Do the boundaries/limitations have a clear explanation, a detailed description, and an audit trail?
What are the study’s advantages and disadvantages?
Is it possible for the researcher to extrapolate the findings to other populations? Explain.
Assess the significance of the findings and implications for nursing (both qualitative and quantitative).
4–6 double-spaced pages plus a cover page and a reference page should make up the body of your paper. The critique should be appended to the article and formatted according to Ace homework tutors – APA standards.
Do you require Ace homework tutors – APA assistance?
Along with your assignment, you must send the research study articles.
For more information on how your assignment will be judged, look over the rubric.
Rubric
NURS 350 OL – NURS350-Research Critique NURS 350 OL – NURS350-Research Critique
NURS 350 OL – NURS350-Research Critique NURS 350 OL – NURS350-Research Critique
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion has a Learning OutcomeResearch Problem/Purpose attached to it.
28.92 pts to >24.92 pts
Expectations are met or exceeded
The research problem, purpose, and relevance to nursing are all well stated.
>21.0 pts 24.92 pts 24.92 pts 24.92 pts 24
Mostly Accomplishes Expectations
The research problem, the objective of the research, and the relation to nursing are all identified to some extent.
>16.52 pts to 21 pts
Expectations were not met.
The research challenge, the objective of the research, and the relevance of the research to nursing are frequently missing or misrepresented.
16.52 points. to 0 pts.
Expectations aren’t met
The research problem, purpose, and relevance to nursing are all missing.
28 points
This criterion is tied to a Review of the Literature Learning Outcome.
42.38 pts to >37.38 pts
Expectations are met or exceeded
The literature review’s key concepts are clearly stated. Reference criticism is included and effectively developed.
37.38 points. to 31.5 pts.
Mostly Accomplishes Expectations
The literature review’s concepts have been identified to some extent. Reference criticism is included, but it may not be fully developed.
>24.78 pts 31.5 pts 31.5 pts 31.5 pts 31.5
Expectations were not met.
The literature review’s concepts are incorrectly identified. Reference criticism is woefully weak.
24.78 points. to 0 pts.
Expectations aren’t met
There are no concepts discussed in the literature review. The allusions are not questioned.
42 points
This criterion is tied to a Theoretical Framework for Learning Outcomes.
28.92 pts to >24.92 pts
Expectations are met or exceeded
A theoretical concept/framework is identified and thoroughly examined for suitability. A suitable concept/framework is recommended if the article lacks one.
>21.0 pts 24.92 pts 24.92 pts 24.92 pts 24
Mostly Accomplishes Expectations
A theoretical concept/framework is identified and evaluated for suitability. A potential concept/framework is suggested if the article lacks one, however it is slightly inappropriate.
>16.52 pts to 21 pts
Expectations were not met.
A theoretical concept/framework is identified and evaluated for suitability. If the article is missing a concept/framework, a prospective concept/framework is proposed but not identified, or the concept/framework is wildly incorrect.
16.52 points. to 0 pts.
Expectations aren’t met
A theoretical concept or framework is misidentified or not properly evaluated.
28 points
Variables, Hypotheses, Questions, and Assumptions are all linked to a Learning Outcome.
14.46 pts to >14.46 pts
Expectations are met or exceeded
The IV and DV syndromes are recognized and defined. There is also a discussion of measurability. The research topic as well as the hypothesis have been identified.
12.46 points. to 10.5 pts.
Mostly Accomplishes Expectations
IV and DV have been identified and/or characterized to some extent. Measurability is discussed in some detail. The research question and hypothesis have been identified in part.
>8.26 pts 10.5 pts 10.5 pts 10.5 pts 10.5
Expectations were not met.
Identification and definition of IV and DV are either missing or significantly deficient. Measurability is either ignored or misunderstood. The research topic and hypothesis are either not identified or are drastically incorrectly identified.
8.26 points. to 0 pts.
Expectations aren’t met
I, IV, and DV The terms “identification” and “definition” aren’t used. There is no mention of measurability. There is no mention of a research question or hypothesis.
14 points
This criterion has a Learning OutcomeMethodology attached to it.
56.84 pts to >49.84 pts
Expectations are met or exceeded
The design type, sample size, study population, sampling method, and reasoning process are all correctly identified. The topics of measurement tool reliability and validity, ethical considerations, and probability vs. non-probability sampling are examined.
>42.0 pts 49.84 pts 49.84 pts 49.84 pts 49
Mostly Accomplishes Expectations
The type of design, sample size, study population, sampling process, and reasoning approach are all identified to some extent. Some information is incorrect, including measurement tool reliability and validity, ethical implications, and probability vs. non-probability sampling.
42.04 pts to >33.04 pts
Expectations were not met.
The type of design, sample size, study population, sampling method, and reasoning process are either missing or incorrectly identified. Ethical considerations, measurement tool reliability and validity, and probability vs. non-probability sampling are all either lacking or severely wrong.
>0 pts to 33.04 pts
Expectations aren’t met
There is no mention of the type of design, sample size, study population, sampling process, or explanation. There is no mention of measurement tool reliability and validity, ethical considerations, or probability vs. non-probability sampling.
56 points
This criterion is tied to a Data Analysis of Learning Outcomes.
42.38 pts to >37.38 pts
Expectations are met or exceeded
A tool for data analysis has been identified. An explanation of how the study’s findings are presented is included, and it is correct. At least one finding has been identified correctly.
37.38 points. to 31.5 pts.
Mostly Accomplishes Expectations
A data analysis tool has been identified to some extent. There is an insufficient description of how the study’s findings are presented. At least one discovery has been made.
>24.78 pts 31.5 pts 31.5 pts 31.5 pts 31.5
Expectations were not met.
The data analysis tool is missing or incorrectly identified. An explanation of how the study’s findings are presented is either missing or extremely ambiguous. Findings are either missing or highly misleading.
24.78 points. to 0 pts.
Expectations aren’t met
There is no data analysis tool. There is no explanation of how the study’s findings are presented. The results aren’t included.
42 points
Homework help – Summary, Conclusions, Implications, and Recommendations are all tied to this criterion.
56.84 pts to >49.84 pts
Expectations are met or exceeded
The study’s strengths and weaknesses are identified. There is also a discussion of whether the findings can be generalized. An proper evaluation of the findings, conclusions, and relevance to nursing is included.
>42.0 pts 49.84 pts 49.84 pts 49.84 pts 49
Mostly Accomplishes Expectations
The study’s strengths and weaknesses have been identified to some extent. There is a dispute on whether the study can be generalized, but it may not be fully developed. An assessment of the results, conclusions, and relevance to nursing may not be completed.
42.04 pts to >33.04 pts
Expectations were not met.
The study’s strengths and weaknesses are missing or non-existent. There is no discussion of whether or not the study can be generalized. There is no or insufficient evaluation of the data, conclusions, and relevance to nursing.
>0 pts to 33.04 pts
Expectations aren’t met
The study’s strengths and shortcomings aren’t mentioned. There is no discussion of whether the findings can be generalized. There is no assessment of the findings, conclusions, or relevance to nursing.
56 points
This criterion is tied to a Mechanics and Ace homework tutors – APA Format Learning Outcome.
14.46 pts to >14.46 pts
Expectations are met or exceeded
Written in a manner that is clear, concise, formal, and well-organized. The majority of the responses are error-free. The information from sources is paraphrased and cited correctly.
12.46 points. to 10.5 pts.
Mostly Accomplishes Expectations
The writing is generally straightforward and ordered, however the language is neither succinct or formal. Multiple spelling and grammar problems occur, causing moderate readability and comprehension issues. The majority of content is appropriately paraphrased and cited from sources.
>8.26 pts 10.5 pts 10.5 pts 10.5 pts 10.5
Expectations were not met.
In general, writing is illegible and disorganized. Readability and comprehension are harmed by some spelling and grammar problems. Sources aren’t cited correctly or aren’t cited at all.
8.26 points. to 0 pts.
Expectations aren’t met
The writing is disorganized and vague. Readability and comprehension are harmed by spelling and grammar errors. There are no sources available.
