Statistics Project, Part 1: Opening Data in Microsoft® Excel® and Running Descriptive Statistics
Name
University of
PSYCH/625: Statistics for the Behavior Sciences
Name
August 17, 2020
Statistics Project – Part I: Opening Data in Excel and Running Descriptive Statistics
o Gender
o Male:24, Female:26
o Age
o Mean:32.02 Median:31 Mode:29
o Relationship with Direct Supervisor
o Mean:2.5 Median:3 Mode:3
o
o Telecommute Schedule
o Mean:1.18 Median:1 Mode:1
o
o Relationship with Coworkers
o Mean:1.92 Median:2 Mode:2
o
o Workplace Happiness Rating
o Mean:7.4 Median:8 Mode:8
o
o Workplace Engagement Rating
o Mean:7.64 Median:7 Mode:8
Descriptive Statistics – Extract from Excel
Descriptives on Gender
Mean 1.52
Standard Error 0.071371
Median 2
Mode 2
Standard Deviation 0.504672
Sample Variance 0.254694
Kurtosis -2.07801
Skewness -0.08256
Range 1
Minimum 1
Maximum 2
Sum 76
Count 50
Confidence Level (95.0%) 0.143426
Age Descriptives
Mean 32.02
Standard Error 0.613780523
Median 31.5
Mode 29
Standard Deviation 4.340083701
Sample Variance 18.83632653
Kurtosis -1.08642014: 2024 – Essay Writing Service | Write My Essay For Me Without Delay7
Skewness 0.188689657
Range 15
Minimum 25
Maximum 40
Sum 1601
Count 50
Confidence Level (95.0%) 1.23343814
Supervisor Descriptives
Mean 2.5
Standard Error 0.14357
Median 3
Mode 3
Standard Deviation 1.015191
Sample Variance 1.030612
Kurtosis -1.06177
Skewness -0.06096
Range 3
Minimum 1
Maximum 4
Sum 125
Count 50
Confidence Level (95.0%) 0.288514
Telecommute Descriptives
Mean 1.18
Standard Error 0.054884
Median 1
Mode 1
Standard Deviation 0.388088
Sample Variance 0.150612
Kurtosis 0.988872
Skewness 1.717824
Range 1
Minimum 1
Maximum 2
Sum 59
Count 50
Confidence Level (95.0%) 0.110293
Coworkers Descriptives
Mean 1.92
Standard Error 0.094069
Median 2
Mode 2
Standard Deviation 0.665168
Sample Variance 0.442449
Kurtosis -0.65243
Skewness 0.08876
Range 2
Minimum 1
Maximum 3
Sum 96
Count 50
Confidence Level (95.0%) 0.189039
Workplace Happiness Descriptives
Mean 7.4
Standard Error 0.2
Median 8
Mode 8
Standard Deviation 1.414214
Sample Variance 2
Kurtosis -0.24984
Skewness -0.71252
Range 5
Minimum 4
Maximum 9
Sum 370
Count 50
Confidence Level (95.0%) 0.401915
Workplace Engagement Descriptives
Mean 7.64
Standard Error 0.175569046
Median 8
Mode 8
Standard Deviation 1.241460628
Sample Variance 1.54122449
Kurtosis 0.859898343
Skewness -0.934455767
Range 6
Minimum 4
Maximum 10
Sum 382
Count 50
Confidence Level (95.0%) 0.352819207
Homework help – Summary
Variable Description of Values
Gender 1= Male, 2=Female
Age Chronological Age (in years)
Relationship With Direct Supervisor 1 = negative relationship, 2 = neutral relationship, 3 = positive relationship, 4 = great relationship
Telecommute Schedule 1= no ability to telecommute, 2 = able to telecommute at least 2 days per week
Relationship With Coworkers 1 = negative relationship, 2 = no relationship, 3 = positive relationship
Workplace Happiness Rating Scale 0-10, 0 = no happiness, 10 = completely happy
Workplace Engagement Rating Scale 0-10, 1 = no engagement, 10 = highly engaged
Overall Combined Rating Scale 0-20, 0 = not happy and not engaged, 20 = completely happy and highly engaged
According to the presented data, there are 50 people. Twenty-four were males, while twenty-six were females ranging from the age of 25-40. The average age was estimated to be 32.02, while the median was 31, and most of the participants were age twenty-nine. When asked about relationship with supervisor they were told that 1 = negative relationship, 2 = neutral relationship, 3 = positive relationship, 4 = great relationship. The mean of this data was 2.5; the median was three and also the mode. The telecommute portion was 1= no ability to telecommute, two = able to telecommute at least two days per week; the mean of these results was 1.18, the median was a one and the mode remained a one as well. In the relationship with coworkers, the mean was 1.92, the median was two, and the mode was also 2; 1 = negative relationship, two = no relationship, 3 = positive relationship. Workplace Happiness Rating Scale 0-10, 10 = completely happy, its mean was a 7.4, median, and mode an 8. Workplace Engagement Rating Scale 0-10, 10 = highly engaged, its mean was 7.64, the median 7 and the mode 8.
