Length: no more than 2 double spaced pages + Works Best paper writer websites, Custom term paper writing service and Research papers owl essays – Professional help in research projects for students – Cite d 9 points for definition + examples + DL frame + other rhet strategies 1 point for MLA Sources: How many sources should you have? I want you to reference at least three sources we’ve read to support your argument. One must be scholarly–CRT or from Omi & Winant. The other two can be from The New Jim Crow, Robin DiAngelo, etc. Format: A dialogue. I want you to use the DL (Dissoi Logoi) as a frame or you can be a bit more creative and model your RR after the Langston Hughes dialogue. If you use Hughes, be sure you clearly and explicitly identify your different audiences as the DL does. To receive a complete, you must correctly create & highlight your enthymeme (can be at the beginning or end of your RR), summarize, paraphrase, quote, and cite (both in text and in your Works Best paper writer websites, Custom term paper writing service and Research papers owl essays – Professional help in research projects for students – Cite d). You’re going to practice many of the rhetorical strategies, but in order to complete this assignment, you’ll need to include definition, exemplification, and compare and contrast. You might also use the strategies of description and narration, depending. — In a 1963 television segment titled “The Negro and the American Promise,” phenomenal writer and influential thinker, James Baldwin, put the responsibility of eradicating categories of whiteness and blackness squarely on white people in positions of power and privilege. “What white people have to do,” Baldwin said, “is try to find out in their hearts why it was necessary for them to have a nigger in the first place. Because I am not a nigger. I’m a man. If I’m not the nigger here, and if you invented him, you the white people invented him, then you have to find out why. And the future of the country depends on that. Whether or not it is able to ask that question.” In her book, Playing in the Dark: Whiteness and the Literary Imagination, the great writer Toni Morrison said that in a racialized society “there is no escape from racially inflected language, and the work writers do to unhobble the imagination from the demands of that language is complicated, interesting, and definitive.” Why are we doing this? Because as bell hooks contests, until “we decolonize our minds and imaginations” no real and sustained eradication of racialized violence can occur. And because as scholars and sociologists Michael Omi and Howard Winant assert, we must make an effort “to understand race as an unstable and decentered complex of social meanings constantly being transformed by political struggle” if we are to understand the effects of racial formations in every identity, our institutions, and social practices. —- The assignment: Since the beginning of the semester, we’ve been reading about how language shapes knowledge, creates meaning, and the power in narratives to shape political, economic, social, and cultural systems. We’ve extended our analysis to include the definition and effects of racial formations and how, as Michael Omi and Howard Winant argue, the formulation of racial categories is a “central axis of social relations.” So saying, for this RR, we’re going to examine how and where some definition was created, maintained, who reproduced it, and why this matters (so what, who cares), and give examples. You’re going to define a term, examine its denotation and connotation, and then provide examples–your own, possibly, from our texts, from the news–and examine how this informs an ideology about a group (or groups of) people in the US. Implicit and explicit in your analysis, will be how the term is racialized, and the effects of that racialization. Here are some terms you might choose from (or choose your own). Please feel free to use these phrases as examples as you’ll argue differently from your comrades: white privilege, working class whites, privilege, terrorist, the race card, white fragility, alien, American exceptionalism, the poor, thug, law & order, political correctness, toxic masculinity, social justice warrior, taking the knee, black on black crime, colorblindness, etc. There are plenty of examples given in the texts we’ve been reading so don’t be afraid to use one of those. Wayne Booth argues that you need a balanced rhetorical situation to help ensure an ethical argument, which means, in large part, that *you* care about what you’re arguing for so I suggest you choose a phrase that bothers you or that you want to learn more about. Make sure the term is arguable and racially codified. — Since you’re using a dialectical frame (the DL), I’d like you to argue both for and against how the term you chose is constructed, replicated, maintained (you’re analyzing the term’s racial formation and its racial etiquette). You’ll want to begin, as Langston Hughes and Robin DiAngelo do, by defining the phrase. And then give examples, examining the effects. For example, if you’re interested in how an aspect of blackness is constructed you might argue about how the word thug is/isn’t racialized in contemporary US media (and why). You could cite the historical evidence cited in Michelle Alexander’s book The New Jim Crow about how the fiction of black men as violent and aggressive was a racist narrative created by Southern white landowners right after the Civil War in order to maintain and justify white supremacy and continue the enslavement of black men through black codes and convict laws (28). Then you could give contemporary examples. Then you might argue why the category of whiteness needs this definition of blackness; why thug persists; give examples of who maintains it, etc. Or, you might argue, citing from The New Jim Crow, how “law and order” is codified racialized rhetoric to maintain, as Michelle Alexander argues, a racial caste in the US in order to justify imprisoning people of color. Then give examples. And then, how a certain audience–a powerful white one and what does this mean for the category of whiteness; or, a portion of a black audience, etc–would disagree with your argument and why; give examples. You might identify how one of the terms you use fits into Robin DiAngelo’s patterns of white fragility. By the end, I’d like you to reach a point of view. That is, arrive at an enthymeme, complete with a because clause. Your claim should be arguable. Highlight your enthymeme. — Notes: For both sections of the RR, I’m expecting that you’ve read all of what I’ve assigned—BG, The New Jim Crow,” “Racial Formations”, etc & CRT–which means I’m expecting you correctly introduce, paraphrase, and use quotations (don’t forget the signal phrases!). All three of our books have reminders on how to cite according to MLA guidelines & you can also use the plug-n-chug template for your Works Best paper writer websites, Custom term paper writing service and Research papers owl essays – Professional help in research projects for students – Cite d on the Purdue OWL site. You might also check out the film 13th (https://essays.homeworkacetutors.com/write-my-essay/imdb.com/title/tt5895028/) (Links to an external site.) where Michelle Alexander is one of the experts & use that as a source if you want to analyze how, for instance, the “War on Drugs” was also racially codified political strategy in order to justify mass incarceration of black and brown men.

Published by
Ace My Homework
View all posts