Description
This is the question: Think about “truth is subjectivity”: To what extent do you think you should be objective and remove all personal experience and passion from the knowledge of something because those things will make you “biased”? Conversely, to what extent is Kierkegaard right that objectivity is a type of lunacy and dehumanization? Are there things that can only be understood in and through human experience (subjectivity)? Is it possible to have an academic discipline based on truth as subjectivity? What would that education, research, and publication be like?
Read pages 198-211 and respond to the question please ^. Also please, Include 1 or two quotes! from the reading. Quote them and put the page number and that’s all! Thank you.
