PAPER III: STUDY TWO 1 Literature Review

PAPER III: STUDY TWO LITERATURE REVIEW 1
Paper III: Study Two Literature Review (Worth 35 Points)
First M. Last
Florida International University
PAPER III: STUDY TWO LITERATURE REVIEW 2
Purpose of Paper III: Study Two Literature Review
1). Psychological Purpose
Paper III is intended to help you take your original Facebook Rudeness study one step
further by letting you predict how a second independent variable impacts participants. In
this replication with extension study, you have a greater role in a). choosing articles to
include in your follow-up literature review as well as b). identifying how this new variable
influences your hypotheses. Paper III will include your original literature review from
study one (revised based on feedback from Paper I), your study one Method, results, and
discussion (revised based on feedback from Paper II), and a new literature review that
both focuses on the results of study one but adds in new information and references for
study two.
The largest number of Paper III points are provided for your new study two literature
review. Unlike your study one literature review, your study two literature review will
essentially pick up after study one. It builds on and extends study one’s Facebook
Rudeness manipulation, using two levels (polite disagree and rude disagree) of your
original independent variable and similar dependent variables but altering or extending
them into a new study design.
The bulk of this study two literature review concerns a second independent variable that
you and your lab will manipulate. You will need to find five references (minimum) for
this second independent variable. In other words, in Paper III you will answer: “Given
our findings in study one, how will the presence of a second independent variable impact
participant?”
You should end literature review by noting specific hypotheses for the study. Here, you
will address both main effects (outcomes associated with each independent variable alone)
and interactions (the combined impact of your independent variables).
2). APA Formatting Purpose
The second purpose of Paper III is to once again teach you proper APA formatting.
3). Writing Purpose
Finally, this paper is intended to help you refine your writing. You will use feedback from
Paper I and Paper II to improve your grammar, spelling, and content in Paper III.
NOTE: There is a maximum 50% plagiarism limit on this paper. However, this
DOES NOT mean that you can directly plagiarize 50% of your paper. These 50%
similarity is set for our standardization—everyone is writing on the same topic, using
almost same references, and using the same instruction & checklist as an example. In
addition, I will check all the similarity reports in your paper. Copying and pasting
PAPER III: STUDY TWO LITERATURE REVIEW 3
(plagiarism) is NOT ok even with a tiny percent. Furthermore, you will get an auto 0
on this paper if more than 50% overlapping.
Instructions for Paper III: Study Two Literature Review (Worth 35 Points)
This paper will cover both study one (including the literature review, Method section, results
section, and brief Discussion from that study) and literature review to study two.
The good news is that we are continuing with our topic of the Facebook Rudeness study. You
wrote a lot on that already, so here you simply add to it, noting in a second “literature review)
section how a second independent variable might interact with the Facebook Rudeness
manipulation from study one.
1. Title Page: I expect the following format (2 points)—1 page
a. This title page is the same title page on your Papers I and II. Change a little bit:
add the new IV to original paper title.
b. You must have a header and page numbers on each page.
2. Literature Review Study One (3 points)—page limit same with Paper I
a. Make sure to revise the study one literature review from Paper I based on feedback
to that paper. If we made recommendations for improvement and you don’t change
a word, you’ll lose all three points in this section!
b. For Paper III, you will need at least ten references total. You already have five for
the study one literature review, so include five additional references for the study
two literature review.
3. Method Study One (3 points) —page limit same with Paper II
a. Again, revise, revise, revise or risk losing all points in this section
4. Results Study One (3 points) —page limit same with Paper II
a. Do I need to mention revise?
5. Discussion Study One (1 point) —page limit same with Paper II
a. One word – revise!
6. Literature Review Study Two (10 points) —min 2 max 5 pages excluding hypothesis
a. APA formatting for the first page of your literature review
i. Your study two literature review starts right after the discussion for study
one. There is no page break, so have it come right after the discussion on
the very next line.
b. APA formatted citations for the literature review
i. The additional 5 references must be based on peer-viewed published
empirical research reports. Note: Internet blogs, books, magazines,
newspapers, online stories, thesis, dissertations, or Wikipedia are not
acceptable as empirical research reports. Here is a bit more to note:
1. Referring to your first study does not count as a reference in the
new lit rev.
PAPER III: STUDY TWO LITERATURE REVIEW 4
2. Proper citations must be made in the paper. If it sounds like a fact,
then you must provide a citation to support that fact
3. If you directly quote a source, make sure to provide a page number
for where you found that quote. However, I prefer paraphrasing to
direct quotes. I allow three quotes total for the whole paper
(including the two that I allowed in Paper I). If you quote more
than three times you will lose one point for each additional
quote.
c. Content-based requirements for your study two literature review
i. Your study two literature review should use your study one results and
prior research studies as a jumping off point, once again starting with a
broad theme and then narrowing it down. You can start broadly again with
information about the new study independent variable, and then once again
narrow down as you near your hypotheses for study two.
ii. Think about your study two literature review this way: You are writing a
sequel to study one, so your new story picks up where that story left off.
1. At the beginning of your new study two story, your audience knows
some of the story from study one, so there is no need to rewrite
what you already presented. Rather, you need to set the stage for the
new sequel storyline. Introduce your new “character”, or your new
independent variable. Talk about this somewhat in isolation (what
does research say about this variable on its own). Once you define
and clarify what this new variable is and how it has been used in
prior research, start to show how it connects to your own
prediction/study.
a. For example, let’s say your new independent variable is
“credibility of source”, with credible source versus noncredible source as the two levels of the new IV. You would
talk about research on credibility of source and how it
impacts people’s decisions. THEN you talk about how
credibility of source and Type of Post TOGETHER might
impact people. So, step one is to introduce the new
concept while step two is to show how the new concept
fits in with your new study.
2. The last part of the literature review brings the reader to your study
two hypotheses.
a. give a general overview of your research question (smooth
transition from literature review)
b. state your specific predictions / hypotheses given the studies
you talked about in the literature review. This should look
at both main effects and interactions, so you’ll need to
address each IV on its own (main effect for IV1 and
PAPER III: STUDY TWO LITERATURE REVIEW 5
main effect for IV2) and the interaction of the two IVs as
they work together.
Here is a template/example of the new hypotheses (main effects and interaction effect):
Replace A, B, A1, B2, higher, lower, etc. with your study two’s variables and
prediction! This is only a template! You will lose points if directly copying the
template, or don’t reflect your study to it.
The hypotheses in the present study examines the influences of B (put your new IV at B
) and interaction effect of A and B (put your first IV at A, and second IV at B) on how
people feel about fake news. When it comes to how polite Facebook user, people will
think more polite in B1, compared to B2 (put the condition at B1 and B2 that you predict
from literature review). In addition, people will think of more polite in A1B2, compared to
A2B1 (put the condition at A1B2 and A2B1 that you predict from literature
review). When it comes to whether people want to have a conversation with Facebook
user, similar findings will emerge.
7. Citations (4 points)
8. References: same APA format and requirements with Study One References (5 points)—
at least 10 references, 1-2 pages depending on the length of each reference
9. Overall writing quality (4 points)
Make sure you have revised errors from Paper I and II and check your paper for
proper spelling and grammar. The Research Methods Help center is available if
you want someone to look over your paper and give you advice.
Other Guidelines for Paper III: Literature Review
▪ 1). Pay attention to the page length requirements. If you are under the minimum, we will
deduct points. If you go over the maximum, we are a little more flexible (up to a half page
or so), but we want you to try to keep it to the maximum page.
▪ 2). You may get 1-5 points deducted due to lack of originality. For heavy overlapping
issue (directly copying from previous/other students work or other Academic
Misconduct behaviors), you will be reported to Academic Integrity Office and will
bear course, educational, and university sanctions.
▪ 3). Use the Checklist on the next page before you turn in your paper to make sure it is the
best paper you can write!
Checklist – Paper III: Study Two Literature Review
PAPER III: STUDY TWO LITERATURE REVIEW 6
Use the check sheet below to make sure your paper is the best it can be! Make sure you answer
“Yes” to all questions before submitting your paper! Some sections duplicate checklists from
prior papers while those in purple focus on new Study Two Literature Review elements.
General Paper Format (This section is identical to the Papers I and II Checklists)
Yes No
1. Is everything in your paper in 12 point Times New Roman font?
2. Is everything in your paper double spaced?
3. Do you have one inch margins on all sides of the paper?
4. Are the first lines of all paragraphs indented ½ inch?
5. Are your paragraphs aligned left?
6. Is your paper below the 50% plagiarism limit?
Title page (This section is identical to the Papers I and II Checklists)
Yes No Header
1. Is your Running head title in ALL CAPS?
2. Is your Running head in 12 point Times New Roman font?
3. Do you have a page number that is flush right?
Title / Name / Institution
1. Is your paper title capitalized using title case, centered and bold?
2. Are your name and institution correct?
Literature Review Study One (This section is nearly identical to Paper I)
Yes No Title for the literature review
1. Do you have the identical title you used on the title page rewritten at the top of your literature
review?
2. Is this title centered and bold?
3. Does your literature review start on page 2?
Main body of the literature review
1. Does your literature review start broadly, giving a brief overview of the study one to come?
2. Does your literature review start to narrow down toward your hypotheses?
3. Do your paragraphs transition from one to the next? (That is, How does Study A in paragraph A
relate to Study B in paragraph B?)
4. Does your paper end in your study one hypotheses?
Citations for the literature review
1. Did you cite a minimum of 5 references (all peer-reviewed resources)?
2. Are your citations in APA format?
3. If you quoted, did you provide a page number for the direct quote?
4. If you paraphrased in any way, did you cite the source of that information?
Method Section Study One (This section is identical to Paper II – Method Study One)
Yes No Title for the Method section
1. Is the word “Method” centered and in bold? (Note: No page break needed)
Yes No Participants
1. Do you have the word “Participants” flush left and in bold, right below the word “Method”?
2. Did you list out your demographic characteristics, including gender, age, and ethnicity / race?
3. Did you provide the descriptive statistics for (means and standard deviations) for age and italicize
the letters M and SD?
4. Did you provide frequencies for gender and ethnicity/race and italicize the N?
Materials and Procedure
1. Did you mention informed consent?
2. Did you thoroughly describe your independent variable in enough depth and detail that another
researcher could duplicate your materials?
3. Did you give your IVs names that matches up with the name you refer to in the results section?
4. Did you describe all of your analyzed dependent variables, noting the scales you used (e.g. “Yes /
PAPER III: STUDY TWO LITERATURE REVIEW 7
No”, “A scale ranging from 1 (not at all likely) to 9 (very likely))” for EACH of your DVs?
5. Did you fully describe what participants went through in the study, noting the order in which they
received study materials (e.g. first informed consent, then IVs, DVs, and debriefing)?
6. Did you describe debriefing information?
Results Section Study One (This section is identical to Paper II – Results Study One)
Yes No Results
1. Do you have the word “Results” centered and in bold, immediately following the Method section?
2. Did you analyze at least three different dependent variables, including one chi square and two
one-way ANOVAs?
3. Did you mention all of the IVs and the DV by name when talking about your analysis?
4. Did you include means and standard deviations within parentheses for each level of your
independent variable?
5. If your ANOVA was significant, did you include post hoc tests?
6. Did you italicize the letters F, t, p, M, SD, and χ
2
(where appropriate)?
Discussion Section Study One (This section is identical to Paper II – Discussion Study One)
Yes No
1. Do you have the word “Discussion” centered and in bold, immediately following the results
section?
2. Did you remind your reader of your hypothesis?
3. Did you mention whether you supported or did not support your hypothesis?
Literature Review Study Two (This section is completely new)
Yes No Title for the literature review
1. Do you have some title that denotes the start of study two (e.g. something as simple as “Study
Two”)?
2. Is this title centered and bold?
3. Does your literature review start immediately after the study one discussion (there should be no
page break unless it occurs naturally)
Main body of the literature review
1. Does your new literature review start broadly with your second IV, giving a brief overview of
what it entails?
2. Does your literature review start to narrow down toward your study two hypotheses?
3. Do your paragraphs transition from one to the next? (That is, How does Study A in paragraph A
relate to Study B in paragraph B?)
4. Do you tie in your new IV with your original study one IV, showing how they might interact?
5. Does your paper end in your study two hypotheses?
Citations for the literature review
1. Did you cite an additional 5 references (MUST be peer-reviewed resources)?
2. Are your citations in APA format?
3. If you quoted, did you provide a page number for the direct quote?
4. If you paraphrased in any way, did you cite the source of that information?
References Page (This section is similar to Paper I – Literature Reviews)
Yes No Title for the references page
1. Do references start on their own page?
2. Is the word “References” centered?
References – Make sure these are in APA format!
1. Are references listed in alphabetical order (starting with the last name of the first author listed) for
all 10 articles you referenced?
2. Are all citations from the literature review referenced?
3. Did you use hanging indent for all references?
4. Did you use the “&” symbol when listing more than one author name?
5. Did you include the year of publication
PAPER III: STUDY TWO LITERATURE REVIEW 8
6. For article references, is the article title (which is not italicized) with sentence-case capitalization?
7. For article references, is the name of the journal present with title-case capitalization (and this
journal title is italicized)?
8. For article references, is the volume number italicized?
9. For article references, are the page numbers present (not italicized)?
10. For article references, is the doi present and the format is https://doi.org/xxxx?

Published by

Ace My Homework

View all posts