NRSG372: Chronic Illness and Disability
NRSG372_ Assessment 1: Written Assignment_ © Australian Catholic University 2021 _ Page 1 of 4
ASSESSMENT INFORMATION
Assessment Title Written Assignment
Purpose This assessment will provide students with an opportunity to engage with a
health consumer, to gain insight into the impact chronic illness and/or disability
has on the consumers life, and to plan person-centered care in partnership with
a consumer. Students will have the opportunity to apply specific frameworks to
demonstrate critical thinking, clinical reasoning and the principles of caring for
people with a chronic illness or disability. Written consent from your interviewee
to conduct your interview is required.
Stream A Due Date Wednesday, 24th March 2021
Stream B Due Date Wednesday, 5th May, 2021
Time Due 9am
Weighting 50%
Length 1750 words (+/- 10%; includes intext citations, excludes reference list)
Assessment Rubric Appendix A of the NRSG372 unit outline
LEO Resource Written Assignment Unpacking video, NRSG372 LEO assessment tile
LOs Assessed LO1, LO2, LO3, LO6
Task You are required to conduct a phone or video call interview with a real person in
your community who has a chronic illness or disability to discover the impact this
has on their life. You will need to prepare for your interview. McGrath,
Palmgren & Liljedahl (2019: 2024 – Online Assignment Homework Writing Help Service By Expert Research Writers) suggest twelve steps for conducting research
interviews; this article is linked on the NRSG372 reading list for Module one.
Identify two (2) care priorities for your interviewee. Present each priority using
the Levett-Jones (2018: 2024 – Write My Essay For Me | Essay Writing Service For Your Papers Online) Clinical Reasoning Cycle, completing the cycle for each
priority as outlined in the paragraph structure section of this document. For each
priority, identify and rationalise where the person sits on the Roper-Logan
Tierney (RLT) model of nursing independence to dependence continuum. It is
expected that appropriate evidence-based literature will be used to support your
assignment.
Consent Form You will need to gain written consent from your interviewee PRIOR to conducting
your interview and inform your interviewee they may be called at random by the
LIC to confirm consent. There must be evidence that you have interviewed (via
phone or video call) a real person in your community, demonstrated by the
consent form and unique circumstances outlined in your essay. If there is
evidence that students have not conducted a genuine interview an NN grade for
the assessment will be awarded.
AssignmentTutorOnline
NRSG372: Chronic Illness and Disability
NRSG372_ Assessment 1: Written Assignment_ © Australian Catholic University 2021 _ Page 2 of 4
Safety Confidentiality must be maintained. You must de-identify your interviewee in
your paper, by use of a pseudonym, and state this clearly in your paper. Any
identifiable location, organisation, or workplace must be deidentified.
This assessment does not encourage you to diagnose conditions or suggest
treatments to your interviewee.
Those under 18 years of age, carers, or currently enrolled students at Australian
Catholic University, are not to be interviewed.
Students are not to approach strangers for interviews, or to put themselves into
situations of risk. I need help writing my essay – research paper be aware of the impact of conducting an interview on
your interviewee. Should your interviewee become upset, please finish the
interview at that point, and contact the LIC for further advice.
Paragraph Structure Introduction: Introduce the interviewee with a pseudonym (and clearly state it is
a pseudonym), their health status and condition(s), introduce your two care
priorities, outline the frameworks used, finishing with goals associated with each
care priority with a focus on patient centred care. (max 10% of word count).
Para 1: What is your first priority? What their wellbeing status and condition(s), present your two consideration
needs, layout the systems utilized, getting done with objectives related with each
care need with an attention on understanding focused consideration. (max 10% of word check).
Para 1: What is your primary goal? What data have you used to show up at
this? Where on the RLT reliance/freedom continuum (via
gear, medicines, or mediations) Be explicit and clarify the need in
profundity here.
Para 2: What will the outcomes be on the off chance that you don’t address this as your need?
This is the place where you need to legitimize this being your need use proof to help.
Para 3: What is your objective as the attendant comparable to the distinguished consideration need?
Furthermore, what will your intercession be? information have you used to arrive at
this? Where on the RLT dependence/independence continuum (by way of
equipment, treatments, or interventions) Be specific and explain the priority in
depth here.
Para 2: What will the consequences be if you do not address this as your priority?
This is where you need to justify this being your priority- use evidence to support.
Para 3: What is your goal as the nurse in relation to the identified care priority?
And what will your intervention be? You will need to substantiate this with evidence
and a rationale and bring in the NSQHS partnering with consumers standard.
Para 4: What is your second priority? What information have you used to arrive at
this? Where on the RLT dependence/independence continuum (by way of
equipment, treatments, or interventions) Be specific and explain the priority in
depth here.
Para 5: What will the consequences be if you do not address this as your priority?
This is where you need to justify this being your priority- use evidence to support.
Para 6: What is your goal as the nurse in relation to the identified care priority?
And what will your intervention be? You will need to substantiate this with evidence
and a rationale and bring in the NSQHS partnering with consumers standard.
Conclusion: What have you done throughout the paper? What are the next
steps? Evaluation of the interventions will demonstrate what? (max 10% of word
count).
Submission
NRSG372: Chronic Illness and Disability
NRSG372_ Assessment 1: Written Assignment_ © Australian Catholic University 2021 _ Page 3 of 4
1. Consent Form is to be submitted to the “Assessment One Consent Form”
LEO dropbox on your campus tile. I need help writing my essay – research paper ensure you submit to the
dropbox assigned to your stream.
2. Written assignment is to be submitted to the “Assessment One Written
Assignment” LEO dropbox on your campus tile. I need help writing my essay – research paper ensure you submit
to the dropbox assigned to your stream.
FORMATTING
File format .doc or .docx (not .pdf files)
Margins 2.54cm, all sides
Font and size 11-point Calibri or Arial
Spacing 1.5 spacing
Paragraph Aligned to left margin, indent first line of each paragraph 1.27cm
Title Page Not to be used
Level 1 Heading Centered, bold, capitalize each word (14-point Calibri or Arial)
Level 2 Headings Not to be used
Structure Introduction, main paragraphs, conclusion, reference list
Direct quotes Always require page number. No more than 10% of WC in direct quotes
Header Page number top right corner (9 point Calibri or Arial)
Footer Name – Student Number – Ax1 – NRG372 – 2021 (in 9 point Calibri or Arial)
REFRENCING
Referencing Style Ace homework tutors – APA 7th
Minimum References A minimum of 17 high quality resources are to be used.
Age of References Published in the last 5 years as this area of knowledge is rapidly developing
List Heading “References” is centered, bold, on a new page. (in 14 point Calibri or Arial)
Alphabetical Order References are arranged alphabetically by author family name
Hanging Indent Second and subsequent lines of a reference have a hanging indent
DOI Presented as functional hyperlink
Spacing Double spacing the entire reference list, both within and between entries
NRSG372: Chronic Illness and Disability
NRSG372_ Assessment 1: Written Assignment_ © Australian Catholic University 2021 _ Page 4 of 4
ADMINISTRATION
Late Penalties Late penalties will be applied from 9:01am on the due date, incurring 5% penalty
of the maximum marks available up to a maximum of 15%. Assessment tasks
received more than three calendar days after the due or extended date will
receive feedback but will not not be allocated a mark.
Penalty Timeframe Penalty Marks Deducted
09:01am Wednesday to 9am Thursday 5% penalty 5 marks
09:01am Thursday to 9am Friday 10% penalty 10 marks
09:01am Friday to 9am Saturday 15% penalty 15 marks
Received after 09:01 Saturday No mark allocated
Example:
An assignment is submitted 12 hours late and is initially marked at 60 out of
100. A 5% penalty is applied (5% of 100 is 5 marks). Therefore, the student
receives 55 out of 100 as a final mark.
Return of Marks Marks will be generally returned in three weeks; if this is not achievable, you will
be notified via your campus LEO forum.
Final Assignment Marks for the final assessment (assessment two) of NRSG372 will be withheld
until after grade ratification and grade release.
Assessment template project informed by ACU student forums, ACU Librarians and the Academic Skills Unit.
