Discussion week 3
Based on this week’s readings:
From Chapter:19
The conduct of any research project requires consideration of ethical issues. The most important of these concerns includes obtaining informed consent of the participants, protecting participants from harm, and protection of participant privacy. Ethical principles are derived from various national and international statements of principles for the conduct of healthcare–related research, legal requirements primarily at the federal level, as well as regulations at the institutional, governmental, and professional levels. The foundations of the regulatory structure are processes for reviewing, approving, and monitoring research at the institutional level, with accountability to governmental, funding, and professional authorities. The primary responsibility for compliance rests with the individuals conducting the research, specifically the principal investigator and the institutions at which the research is conducted. If conducting international research the regulatory processes are different.
The process of obtaining approval to conduct a research study varies among clinical settings. Many organizations have a nursing research committee (Pintz et al., 2018) that promotes the integration and acculturation of evidence-based practice (EBP) generating nursing research. The research proposals are then submitted to the institutional review board (IRB) or the hospital nursing research committee to examine issues related to the protection of participants from the risks of participating in research. At institutions without a nursing research committee, research proposals may go to the director of nursing research or the institution’s nurse scientist, if there is one, but generally go directly to the IRB for review with all of the other research protocols.
Discuss the need for institutional review boards (IRBs). How can they potentially affect or impact a study? Give a couple of examples [minimum 3].
Please remember for discussion posts: the initial post must be uploaded by the WEDNESDAY of the week and two replies to your peers by Saturday at 2359.
Please be sure to adhere to the following when posting your weekly discussions:
As a reminder, all discussion posts must be a minimum of 350 words initial and 250 words peer responses, references must be cited in APA format 7th Edition and must include a minimum of 3 scholarly resources published within the past 5 years.
Please note the grading rubric for the discussion board.
agent_icon
GPT-4
Revised Text:
Based on this week’s readings:
From Chapter 19, the conduct of any research project requires consideration of ethical issues. These ethical considerations ensure that the dignity and safety of participants are prioritized throughout the research process. The most important of these concerns includes obtaining informed consent of the participants, protecting participants from harm, and protection of participant privacy. Researchers must actively engage with participants to ensure their understanding and comfort with the process, reinforcing trust throughout the study.
Ethical principles are derived from various national and international statements of principles for the conduct of healthcare-related research, legal requirements primarily at the federal level, as well as regulations at the institutional, governmental, and professional levels. This comprehensive framework helps to guide researchers in upholding the highest ethical standards. The foundations of the regulatory structure are processes for reviewing, approving, and monitoring research at the institutional level, with accountability to governmental, funding, and professional authorities. Transparency in the research process fosters public confidence and enhances the credibility of the findings.
The primary responsibility for compliance rests with the individuals conducting the research, specifically the principal investigator and the institutions at which the research is conducted. Their roles are critical in maintaining ethical standards and promoting participant welfare. If conducting international research, the regulatory processes are different, and researchers must familiarize themselves with the local ethical guidelines and regulations.
The process of obtaining approval to conduct a research study varies among clinical settings. This variability can lead to disparities in research quality and ethical oversight across institutions. Many organizations have a nursing research committee (Pintz et al., 2018) that promotes the integration and acculturation of evidence-based practice (EBP) generating nursing research. These committees serve as essential resources for guiding researchers through the ethical considerations necessary for robust study design.
The research proposals are then submitted to the institutional review board (IRB) or the hospital nursing research committee to examine issues related to the protection of participants from the risks of participating in research. IRBs play a vital role in safeguarding participants’ rights and welfare. At institutions without a nursing research committee, research proposals may go to the director of nursing research or the institution’s nurse scientist, if there is one, but generally go directly to the IRB for review with all of the other research protocols. This direct review ensures that all research proposals adhere to ethical guidelines, thereby protecting participant interests.
Discuss the need for institutional review boards (IRBs). How can they potentially affect or impact a study? Give a couple of examples [minimum 3]. IRBs are fundamental in maintaining ethical integrity in research, serving as a checkpoint to address potential ethical concerns. For instance, IRBs can halt a study if significant risks to participant safety are identified, thus avoiding harm.
Please remember for discussion posts: the initial post must be uploaded by the WEDNESDAY of the week and two replies to your peers by Saturday at 2359. Adhering to deadlines is crucial for meaningful engagement and dialogue within the class.
Please be sure to adhere to the following when posting your weekly discussions: this structured approach ensures clarity and consistency across posts. As a reminder, all discussion posts must be a minimum of 350 words initial and 250 words peer responses, and references must be cited in APA format 7th Edition, and must include a minimum of 3 scholarly resources published within the past 5 years. Accurate citations are essential for upholding academic integrity and providing credit to original authors.
Please note the grading rubric for the discussion board. Understanding the assessment criteria can help you align your posts with the expectations set forth by the instructor.
