Due process under the Amendments to the U.S. Constitution can be broken down into two categories:
Substantive due process
Procedural due process.
Both are based on fundamental fairness. For example, the Fourth Amendment protects citizens against government unreasonable search and seizure of personal property. The Fifth and Sixth Amendments guarantee the procedures that the courts and police must follow to ensure fair treatment of persons arrested for crimes.
Preparation
Analyze the following U.S. Supreme Court cases:
Byrd v. United States.
Chavez v. Martinez.
In three to four pages:
Explain the substantive and procedural protections afforded by the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments for defendants charged with crimes today.
Explain due process and how the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments comply with the requirements of due process.
Prepare a one-page brief of Byrd v. United States explaining how the test for privacy and Fourth Amendment search and seizure requirements are validated in the case.
Use the Case Brief Template
Support your writing with at least three credible, relevant, and appropriate academic sources.
Ace my homework – Write in an articulate and well-organized manner that is grammatically correct and free of spelling, typographical, formatting, and/or punctuation errors.
—>
Study Notes
The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution protects citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures of their person, houses, papers, and effects. It requires that a warrant be issued based on probable cause and that it describes the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized.
The Fifth Amendment provides that no person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
The Sixth Amendment guarantees the right to a fair trial, including the right to a public trial, an impartial jury, the right to be informed of the charges against you, the right to confront witnesses, the right to a lawyer, and the right to a speedy trial.
Due process is the principle that the government must respect all of the legal rights that are owed to a person according to the law. These rights include the right to life, liberty, and property, as well as the right to a fair trial. The Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments are examples of how the Constitution protects these rights by placing limits on the government’s power to arrest, prosecute, and punish individuals accused of crimes.
In the case of Byrd v. United States, the Supreme Court held that the Fourth Amendment does not protect a driver’s expectation of privacy in a rental car when the authorized driver is not present and another person is driving the car. The court used a “legitimate expectation of privacy” test to determine whether the defendant had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the rental car. The court found that the defendant did not have a legitimate expectation of privacy because he was not listed as an authorized driver on the rental agreement.
In the case of Chavez v. Martinez, the Supreme Court held that the Fifth Amendment’s Self-Incrimination Clause does not apply to statements made during police interrogations unless the statements are used in a criminal case against the individual. The court found that the defendant’s statements were not used in a criminal case against him, and therefore his Fifth Amendment rights were not violated.
The Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments provide substantive and procedural protections for defendants charged with crimes. They ensure that the government respects the legal rights owed to individuals and that there is a fair process in place for arrest, prosecution, and punishment. The case of Byrd v. United States illustrates how the Fourth Amendment’s protection against unreasonable search and seizure is applied, and how the test for privacy and Fourth Amendment search and seizure requirements are validated in the case. The case of Chavez v. Martinez illustrates how the Fifth Amendment’s Self-Incrimination Clause does not apply to statements made during police interrogations unless the statements are used in a criminal case against the individual.
