ubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
Content
Name: NRNP_6670_Week11_Ace my homework – Write my paper – Online assignment help tutors – Discussion_Rubric
• Grid View
• List View
Outstanding Performance Excellent Performance Competent Performance Proficient Performance Room for Improvement
Main Posting: Response to the discusion question is reflecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. Points Range: 44 (44%) – 44 (44%)
* Thoroughly responds to the discusion question(s) *is reflecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. * supported by at least 3 current, credible sources Points Range: 40 (40%) – 43 (43%)
* Responds to the discusion question(s) *is reflecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module. * 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth * supported by at least 3 credible references Points Range: 35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
* Responds to most of the discusion question(s) *is somewhat reflecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module. * 50% of post has exceptional depth and breadth * supported by at least 3 credible references Points Range: 31 (31%) – 34 (34%)
* Responds to some of the discusion question(s) * one to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addresed *is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis *somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. * post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references Points Range: 0 (0%) – 30 (30%)
* Does not respond to the discusion question(s) * lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria *lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis *does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. * contains only 1 or no credible references
Main Posting: Writing Points Range: 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
* Written clearly and concisely * Contains no grammatical or spelling errors * Fully adheres to current Ace homework tutors – APA manual writing rules and style Points Range: 5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)
* Written clearly and concisely * May contain one or no grammatical or spelling error * Adheres to current Ace homework tutors – APA manual writing rules and style Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
* Written concisely * May contain one to two grammatical or spelling error * Adheres to current Ace homework tutors – APA manual writing rules and style Points Range: 4 (4%) – 5 (5%)
*Writtten somewhat concisely * May contain more than two2 spelling or grammatical errors * Contains some Ace homework tutors – APA formatting erros Points Range: 0 (0%) – 4 (4%)
* Not written clearly or concisely * Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors * Does not adhere to current Ace homework tutors – APA manual writing rules and style
Main Posting: Timely and full participation Points Range: 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
* meets requirements for timely and full participation * posts main discussion by due date Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Points Range: 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
* does not meet requirement for full participation
First Reponse
Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources. Points Range: 9 (9%) – 9 (9%)
* response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings * responds to questions posed by faculty * the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives Points Range: 8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)
* response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings Points Range: 7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)
* response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting Points Range: 6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)
* response is on topic, may have some depth Points Range: 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
* reponse may not be on topic, lacks depth
First Reponse: Writing Points Range: 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
* Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English Points Range: 5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)
* Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
* Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed * Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources * Response is written in Standard Edited English Points Range: 4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)
* Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication * Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed * Few or no credible sources are cited Points Range: 0 (0%) – 4 (4%)
* Responses posted in the discussion lack effective * Response to faculty questions are missing * No credible sources are cited
First Reponse: Timely and full participation Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
* meets requirements for timely and full participation * posts by due date Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
* does not meet requirement for full participation
Second Reponse: Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources. Points Range: 9 (9%) – 9 (9%)
* response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings * responds to questions posed by faculty * the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives Points Range: 8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)
* response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings Points Range: 7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)
* response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting Points Range: 6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)
* response is on topic, may have some depth Points Range: 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
* reponse may not be on topic, lacks depth
Second Reponse: Writing Points Range: 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
* Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English Points Range: 5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)
* Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
* Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed * Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources * Response is written in Standard Edited English Points Range: 4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)
* Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication * Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed * Few or no credible sources are cited Points Range: 0 (0%) – 4 (4%)
* Responses posted in the discussion lack effective * Response to faculty questions are missing * No credible sources are cited
Second Reponse: Timely and full participation Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
* meets requirements for timely and full participation * posts by due date Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
* does not meet requirement for full participation
Total Points: 100
Name: NRNP_6670_Week11_Ace my homework – Write my paper – Online assignment help tutors – Discussion_Rubric
Essay: Substance Abuse Rehabilitation
Essay: Substance Abuse Rehabilitation Rehabilitation is something that has been a topic for many years within the criminal justice system. It is a complex issue with ongoing debates about its effectiveness and ethical implications. Is it possible for an offender to be rehabilitated? This question lies at the heart of the ongoing discussion surrounding rehabilitation […]