Class Assignment #8
As you know, a number of governors are considering the stoppage of elective abortions from being performed while the Coronavirus is an issue. They argue that doctors, as well as medical staff and equipment, are needed to treat critically ill Coronavirus patients. They also argue that elective abortions and other elective procedures would interfere with the demands of treating Coronavirus patients. Leaders of pro-choice organizations disagree. They contend that this is just a ploy to make abortion unavailable. What do you think? Below, I’ve pasted a recent article that talks about this.
What I need you to do for this assignment — I need help writing my essay – research paper write a minimum of three paragraphs explaining your feelings on the issue. It is important that you cite information from this article (or another source or sources) in your discussion. You may include other sources (such as articles from the library’s databases or, in this case, from newsarticles and government sources) in your discussion.
I need help writing my essay – research paper submit this by Sunday, August 2, 2020. I need help writing my essay – research paper do not send it as an attachment; send it as an email message to [email protected]. I need help writing my essay – research paper label it “Sociology 200; Class Assignment #8, the name of the assignment (which is Class Assignment #8), and your name. Thanks. Cordially, Richard Bobys
ARTICLE: “Some states have halted abortions because of the pressure to treat
coronavirus patients”
As the coronavirus pandemic sweeps the country, physicians and
hospitals are canceling elective, nonessential surgeries and
procedures to preserve health-care resources, including scarce
personal protective equipment, and to limit potential patients’
exposure to the virus.
But what exactly counts as “elective?” A growing number of states are
putting abortion in that category. These state efforts could affect
women’s rights to terminate pregnancies for a long time to come.
Covid-19 measures have effectively banned abortion in some states
Virginia, Washington, Illinois and New York have explicitly protected
family planning services from being canceled as elective. But a
growing number of states — Ohio, Texas, Mississippi and, most
recently, Kentucky — have used this pandemic to halt abortions in
their states, except when the woman’s life is in immediate danger
without one.
For instance, Ohio’s Department of Health writes that “nonessential
surgical abortions are those that can be delayed without undue risk to
the current or future health of the patient,” and instructed the
state’s abortion clinics to halt abortions. However, abortion’s health
risks are lowest in a pregnancy’s first trimester, when approximately
90 percent are performed; abortion costs are higher as the pregnancy
continues; and legal abortion is safer than childbirth. What’s more,
if coronavirus isn’t contained soon, for many women any delay getting
an abortion is likely, in reality, to be a ban.
The Supreme Court considered whether states can ‘protect’ women from
abortion. What’s behind that argument?
Governors and other officials are declaring abortions to be
“nonessential” medical procedures, an antiabortion goal
With the covid-19 pandemic straining health-care resources,
antiabortion groups are working to redefine abortion as nonessential,
which is one of their longtime goals.
Since the Supreme Court’s 1973 decision in Roe v. Wade struck down
laws against abortion, the antiabortion strategy has been to pass
state laws limiting abortion access and to fight for those laws in the
federal courts, as political scientist Josh Wilson explored. For
example, the Supreme Court’s 1992 decision in Planned Parenthood v.
Casey enabled states to impose their own constraints on abortion
access.
Since then, some states have worked to codify Roe v. Wade, while
others, such as Texas and Alabama, enact Targeted Regulation of
Abortion Provider (“TRAP”) laws that effectively close abortion
clinics by imposing stringent requirements about such issues as
corridor width and whether physicians have admitting privileges at
nearby hospitals. The Guttmacher Institute reported that Louisiana
alone has enacted 89 abortion restrictions since Roe, with many other
states passing dozens as well. However, as political scientist
Marshall Medoff found, TRAP laws don’t reduce women’s pursuit of
abortion services.
Antiabortion policies are more likely to be adopted in states with a
more strongly antiabortion electorate. But as political scientist
Susan Roberts explored here at TMC last year, the antiabortion
interest group Americans United for Life (AUL) has been behind the
spread of particular measures; in 2014: 2024 – Essay Writing Service | Write My Essay For Me Without Delay, AUL consulted on antiabortion
measures in 32 states. These measures have collectively sought to make
abortion “legal but inaccessible.” AUL has praised Ohio’s and Texas’s
efforts to shut down abortions during the pandemic, though on March
30, a federal judge temporarily blocked Texas from halting abortions
as part of the state’s pandemic response.
Alabama state legislators are wrong about their voters’ opinions on abortion
The cost of unwanted pregnancies may be higher during the pandemic
With businesses shuttered, the economy rapidly contracting and a
record number of nearly 3.3 million jobless claims reported this
month, women who are not financially prepared to have a child may face
particular financial hardship as their medical costs increase during
pregnancy. Further, compared to women with planned pregnancies, those
with mistimed or unwanted pregnancies are less likely to receive early
prenatal care, and unwanted pregnancies are more likely to result in
preterm birth or low birth weight; women with unwanted pregnancies are
more likely to smoke and less likely to breast-feed, which are both
associated with less healthy children.
Early research suggests that pregnant women recover well from
covid-19. Nevertheless, carrying an unwanted pregnancy to term can
mean serious economic challenges both for the parents and for the
United States at large.
President Trump has often touted his antiabortion credentials, saying,
“I am pro-life and pro-life people will find out that I will be very
loyal to them” and pledging to appoint antiabortion judges. As
abortions rights observer Katha Pollitt recently outlined in the
Atlantic, clinics that close temporarily often cannot afford to
reopen. In some states, the pandemic, not judges, might be how the
antiabortion movement succeeds in ending legal surgical abortion.
