Criteria Ratings Points
Abstract 17 to >14.0 pts
Advanced
• All required
information is
included. • No
extraneous
information is
included; formatting is
correct.
14 to >10.0 pts
Proficient
• All required information
is included. • Some
extraneous information is
included; formatting is
correct.
10 to >0.0 pts
Developing
• Some required
information is included.
• Extraneous information
is included; formatting is
not correct.
0 pts
Not
Present
17 pts
Introduction 17 to >14.0 pts
Advanced
• Background
information is
engaging and leads
to a clear
purpose/thesis
statement.
• Relevance to
course/topic is
articulated well.
• Research
question(s) or
purpose statement is
clear and concise.
• Two or 3 main
discussion points of
the literature review
are clearly identified
in the purpose
statement.
14 to >10.0 pts
Proficient
• Background information
is at times unclear or
uninteresting.
• Relevance to
course/topic could be
more clearly articulated.
• Research question(s) or
purpose statement could
be stated more clearly
and concisely. • Main
discussion points could
be more clearly
articulated.
10 to >0.0 pts
Developing
• Background information
is not clearly articulated.
• Relevance to
course/topic is unclear.
• Research question(s) or
purpose statement is
unidentifiable. • Main
discussion points are not
identified in the purpose
statement.
0 pts
Not
Present
17 pts
Content 20 to >15.0 pts
Advanced
• Thorough
comparison and
contrast of findings
are provided and
relate to the main
discussion points in
the order of their
appearance in the
purpose statement.
• Focus is on
research findings.
• Gaps and
controversies that
exist in the literature
are clearly discussed.
15 to >12.0 pts
Proficient
• Comparison and
contrast of the findings
are provided but lack
thoroughness.
• Ace my homework – Write my paper – Online assignment help tutors – Discussion of findings
could relate better to the
main discussion points in
the purpose statement.
• Gaps and controversies
in the literature are
discussed, but clarity
could be enhanced.
12 to >0.0 pts
Developing
• Comparison and
contrast of findings are
lacking. • Ace my homework – Write my paper – Online assignment help tutors – Discussion of
findings does not relate
well to the main
discussion points in the
purpose statement.
• Gaps (what is unknown
and needs to be
researched) and
controversies that exist in
the literature are not
discussed.
0 pts
Not
Present
20 pts
Research Project: Draft Grading Rubric | BUSI629_D01_202220
Criteria Ratings Points
Conclusion 17 to >14.0 pts
Advanced
• A summary of the
main points is clearly
articulated.
• Implications or
conclusions related to
business practice(s)
are logical, relevant,
and clear. • Areas of
future research are
clearly identified.
14 to >10.0 pts
Proficient
• A summary of the main
points is presented, but
clarity could be enhanced.
• Implications or
conclusions related to
business practice(s) are
included but lack logic,
relevance, or clarity.
• Areas of future research
are identified but lack
clarity.
10 to >0.0 pts
Developing
• A summary of the main
points is not clearly
presented. • Implications
or conclusions related to
business practice(s) are
absent, illogical, irrelevant,
or unclear. • Areas of
future research are not
identified.
0 pts
Not
Present
17 pts
References
(Number of
Sources Utilized)
17 to >14.0 pts
Advanced
• A total of 15 or
more scholarly
articles from
peer-reviewed
sources is included.
14 to >10.0 pts
Proficient
• A total of 14–10 more
scholarly articles from
peer-reviewed sources
are included.
10 to >0.0 pts
Developing
• Less than 10 scholarly
articles from
peer-reviewed sources
are included.
0 pts
Not
Present
17 pts
Title Page 11 to >8.0 pts
Advanced
• All required
information is
included. • No
extraneous
information is
included.
8 to >5.0 pts
Proficient
• All required information
is included. • Some
extraneous information is
included.
5 to >0.0 pts
Developing
• Some required
information is included.
• Extraneous information
is included.
0 pts
Not
Present
11 pts
Logical Flow 11 to >8.0 pts
Advanced
• The reader is
guided smoothly
through the logically
arranged paper.
• Current Ace homework tutors – APA level
headings are used.
• No headings are
left alone at the
bottom of a page.
8 to >5.0 pts
Proficient
• The overall
arrangement is logical but
is occasionally difficult to
follow. • A minor
formatting error or 2 are
noted in the headings.
• No headings are left
alone at the bottom of a
page.
5 to >0.0 pts
Developing
• The arrangement of
content is haphazard and
difficult to follow.
• Headings are not
present or are formatted
inappropriately. • One (or
more) heading is alone at
the bottom of a page.
0 pts
Not
Present
11 pts
Research Project: Draft Grading Rubric | BUSI629_D01_202220
Criteria Ratings Points
Font, Margins and
Spacing
11 to >8.0 pts
Advanced
• Times New Roman
or Arial is used. • A
margin of 1 1/2 inch is
used on the left
border; margins of 1
inch are used on the
top, right, and bottom
borders. • Page
number and page
header are inserted at
the top of each page.
• Double-spacing is
used between all
lines. • There is only
1 space between
sentences.
• Paragraphs are
indented 5 spaces.
8 to >5.0 pts
Proficient
• Times New Roman or
Arial is used through most
of the document. • A
margin of 1 1/2 inch is
used on the left border;
margins of 1 inch are
used on the top, right, and
bottom borders. • Page
number and page header
are absent or typed rather
than inserted at the top of
each page.
• Double-spacing is used
between most lines.
• There is only 1 space
between sentences.
• Paragraphs are
indented 5 spaces.
5 to >0.0 pts
Developing
• Times New Roman or
Arial is not used. • A
margin of 1 1/2 inch is not
used on the left border;
margins of 1 inch are not
used on the top, right, and
bottom borders. • Page
number and page header
are absent or typed rather
than inserted at the top of
each page.
• Double-spacing is not
used consistently between
lines. • There is often
more than 1 space
between sentences.
• Paragraphs are not
indented 5 spaces.
0 pts
Not
Present
11 pts
Rferences
(Formatting)
11 to >8.0 pts
Advanced
• Proper formatting is
used throughout the
reference list. • Each
reference has a
matching citation(s).
8 to >5.0 pts
Proficient
• A minor formatting error
or 2 are noted in the
reference list. • Each
reference has a matching
citation(s).
5 to >0.0 pts
Developing
• Multiple formatting
errors occurred in the
reference list. • One or
more reference does not
have a matching citation.
0 pts
Not
Present
11 pts
Spelling/Grammar 11 to >8.0 pts
Advanced
• Spelling and
grammar are correct.
8 to >5.0 pts
Proficient
• Spelling and grammar
are mostly correct with
only 1–2 errors noted.
5 to >0.0 pts
Developing
• Spelling and grammar
require further review with
3–6 errors noted.
0 pts
Not
Present
11 pts
Word Count 17 to >14.0 pts
Advanced
• The page count is
20 (excluding title
page, abstract, etc.)
14 to >10.0 pts
Proficient
• The page count is
19-15 (excluding title
page, abstract, etc.)
10 to >0.0 pts
Developing
• The page count is less
than 15 pages (excluding
title page, abstract, etc.)
0 pts
Not
Present
17 pts
Total Points: 160
Research Project: Draft Grading Rubric | BUSI629_D01_202220
—————-
Criteria Ratings Abstract Points 17 to >14.0 pts
Advanced
• Everything is required.
data is available
• Not included.
extraneous
data is available
included; formatting is included
correct.
14 to more than 10.0 pts
Proficient
• All necessary information
• Some are included
extraneous data is
included; formatting is included
correct.
10 to >0.0 pts
Developing
• Some required
information is included.
• Extraneous information
is included; formatting is
not correct.
0 pts
Not
Present
17 pts
Introduction 17 to >14.0 pts
Advanced
• Background
information is
engaging and leads
to a clear
purpose/thesis
statement.
• Relevance to
course/topic is
articulated well.
• Research
question(s) or
purpose statement is
clear and concise.
• Two or 3 main
discussion points of
the literature review
are clearly identified
in the purpose
statement.
14 to >10.0 pts
Proficient
• Background information
is at times unclear or
