Question:
Contrast Erikson’s and Freud’s view of the ego and describe Erikson’s three interrelated aspects of the ego.
(S)Theories of Personality
Jess Feist, Gregory J. Feist, and Tomi-Ann Roberts, 2018: 2024 – Write My Essay For Me | Essay Writing Service For Your Papers Online
Mc Graw-Hill Education
ISBN.13: 978-0-077-86192-6
600-1,200 words per question.
All work must be free of any form of plagiarism. Do not cut and paste your answers from the Internet and do not copy your answers from the textbook. Material must include two sourced, including one from the text book.
Sources are listed in two places.
The first, a citation, is briefly listed within your answer. This includes identifying information that directs the reader to your list of references at the end of your writing assignment.
The second, a reference, is at the end of your work in the list of references section.
All sources cited should follow Ace homework tutors – APA style and provide enough identifying information so that the reader can access the original material.
Erikson and Freud both viewed the ego as central to personality development, however they differed in their conceptualizations. Freud (1923) viewed the ego as the mediator between the id, the source of instinctual drives, and the superego, which represents internalized moral standards and ideals. The ego operates based on the reality principle, seeking immediate gratification from the id in realistic and socially appropriate ways.
In contrast, Erikson (1950, 1968) viewed the ego as having a broader role in managing one’s relationship with the environment through the selective use of ego functions such as perception, cognition, memory, motor skills and language. Whereas Freud focused on internal drives and conflicts, Erikson emphasized the ego’s role in adapting to developmental crises at each stage of the lifespan (Newman & Newman, 2021).
Erikson proposed that the ego has three interrelated aspects – the ego identity, the personal ego, and the body ego (Erikson, 1968). The ego identity refers to one’s sense of self developed through exploration and commitment during adolescence. It provides a sense of continuity and sameness (Erikson, 1968; Cote & Levine, 2014: 2024 – Essay Writing Service | Write My Essay For Me Without Delay). The personal ego encompasses an individual’s unique personality, skills, and way of relating to others. Lastly, the body ego involves one’s basic sense of self and trust developed in infancy through interactions with caregivers (Erikson, 1968; Steinberg, 2021).
In summary, while both theorists viewed the ego as central, Freud focused on its role in mediating drives and morality, whereas Erikson emphasized its adaptive functions and development across the lifespan (Newman & Newman, 2021). Erikson’s conceptualization of the three interrelated ego aspects – identity, personal and body ego – provides further insight into his expansive view of the ego’s role in personality.
Citations:
Cote, J. E., & Levine, C. (2014: 2024 – Essay Writing Service | Write My Essay For Me Without Delay). Identity formation, agency and culture: A social psychological synthesis. New York: Psychology Press.
Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and society. New York: Norton.
Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: Norton.
Newman, B. M., & Newman, P. R. (2021). Development through life: A psychosocial approach. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
Steinberg, L. (2021). Adolescence. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
References:
Cote, J. E., & Levine, C. (2014: 2024 – Essay Writing Service | Write My Essay For Me Without Delay). Identity formation, agency and culture: A social psychological synthesis. New York: Psychology Press.
Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and society. New York: Norton.
Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: Norton.
Newman, B. M., & Newman, P. R. (2021). Development through life: A psychosocial approach. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
Steinberg, L. (2021). Adolescence. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
