Assignment: Critiquing Quantitative, Qualitative, or Mixed Methods Studies
Analyzing quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-methods research
Critiquing the validity and robustness of published research is essential for evidence-based practice. Weeks 5 and 6 focused on quantitative research. Week 7 will focus on qualitative and mixed techniques research. This Assignment requires you to analyze and contrast quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies research studies.
Prep:
Choose a health topic that relates to your current practice. Your Course Portfolio Project or another topic of your choice.
Find two papers in scholarly publications about your portfolio topic in the Walden Library: 1) Pick one article with a quantitative design and 2) pick one with a qualitative OR mixed design. Not systematic or integrative reviews, just isolated studies (including meta-analysis and metasynthesis). Use articles from your reference list. Not finding these two sorts of research on your portfolio topic? Pick another.
Find the following documents in this week’s Learning Resources to obtain the templates for each article:
Critique a Qualitative Study
Critique a Quantitative Study
Mixed-Methods Study Critique Template
Consider the template fields as you read each article. Begin drafting a paper analyzing the two research methodologies listed below. Take stock of both quantitative and qualitative research. How would you reply if told “Qualitative research is not true science”?
To finish this task:
Fill in the two critiques using the templates.
Get custom essay samples and course-specific study resources via course hero homework for you service – Include in your paper the following:
Compare and contrast the information gleaned from the two research methods used in the articles you choose.
Describe the general benefits and drawbacks of the two research methodologies discussed. Cite instances from the articles.
Explain why qualitative research is not actual science. Describe the general insights that quantitative and qualitative research can bring. Cite the Learning Resources and other reliable sources to back up your claim.
Remember to:
Use the Walden Writing Center to submit your document to Grammarly and SafeAssign. Revise your paper based on the Grammarly and SafeAssign reports.
Reminder: All papers must have a title page, introduction, summary, and references. Example of a School of Nursing Sample Paper from the Walden Writing Center (accessed on the Walden University website in this week’s Learning Resources). All papers must follow this format.
Combine the critique templates and the narrative with your references into one Word document. Send this merged document.
